Agree heaps of stolen money through the bookies. Don't think that's the issue. More an issue of if you can prove the bookie could have reasonably known it was stolen and if the people they stole it from has the money to push the issue. To be that's a yes on both counts. The report in the paper suggests IAS knew this guy was a bank manager at Karratha, a mug punter, an increasingly desparate punter and had lost $19 mill. What's a reasonable assumption to make about where the money is coming from?
Court has already found bookies need to pay back 2.4 mill from the guy from K&S that stole. Bookies are appealling.
Like I say I could be wrong but it's got to be a risk.
Cheers
hots
IAS
international all sports limited
