lost support, page-42

Dott, agree with your point about the delay and would prefer to see more explanation by management, particularly of the reason, "EPA processing timelines for salt evaporation circuit".

tcisboss, the explanation given to InvestEgate doesn't help understanding of the EPA problem. Yes it's great, "to increase plant efficiencies and lower operating cost per tonne" at this stage of the project, particularly if cash is accumulating (let's hope well beyond the $3M at end of March) to cover it. However, we so far have little to assess the risks and potential for further delays around EPA. If you or InvestEgate can enlighten further on EPA reason that would be appreciated.