andres - yes, but if a majority of holders vote NO the scheme fails, even if a majority of shares votes YES.
however, i do agree that the number of holders who will vote NO is minimal.
as an example, I was involved last year (as a CAH shareholder) in the Catalpa (CAH) / Conquest Mining (CQT) scheme of arrangement to create Evolution Mining.
It was the CQT shareholders who had to vote on the scheme of arrangement and the results of the vote were as follows:
% shares for - 99.13%
against - 0.87%
% holders for - 94.91%
against - 5.09%
Therefore there were obviously a number of small holders who voted NO, but not enough of them to derail the deal.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SDL
- low ball chinese bid tossed out
low ball chinese bid tossed out , page-48
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SDL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online