low ball chinese bid tossed out , page-52

westcott,

"The Company would get more YES votes if they come clean and tell shareholders if they are in talks with others about a Joint Venture/Sharing of Infrastructure costs, Infrastructure Funding by MOU Partners with payback through off-take agreements or the like."

Doesn't logic tell you that if there was other serious options on the table regarding JV's and sharing infrastructure costs, or funding via MOU's, the SDL board would have cut ties with Hanlong months ago? Why would the board be still in discussions with Hanlong if other, better, options were on the table? I don't understand, if there was a fantastic infrastructure JV with Core staring at GJ, GC & Co, why on Earth do you think they would still be entertaining this Hanlong episode? How does that seem at all logical to you?