Agree that our track record has been nothing but atrocious, with failures at every turn filled with delays all in between self-hyped rhetoric that has never been close to being realised. But with that aside your comment made me think about management and a possible review post MPA.
Given that India is all about relationships... would it be prudent at this stage to remove all our management? I personally don't see this as having a positive effect with respect to our ongoing India project. The Indians are all about people and building long-term relationships, it's taken us this long (years) to get to a point where they MAY want to do business with us. I think it's important to keep the key players with respect to the India project and for me- that person is Ashley M, hands down.
Otherwise, I do think it's a good idea to bring onboard people that have the proven track record at bringing tech to commercialisation, the next step we as a company will embark upon post MPA. I'd be interested to hear peoples thoughts because I thought it was a good comment by @DoubleDutch.
Who in current management is not really required moving forward?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ECT
- Low cost Steel invention
Low cost Steel invention, page-26
Featured News
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.343M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
64 | 28613814 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 12041217 | 24 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
64 | 28613814 | 0.002 |
30 | 39536532 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 12041217 | 24 |
0.004 | 5782988 | 10 |
0.005 | 3887859 | 25 |
0.006 | 5155234 | 9 |
0.007 | 918333 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ECT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable