Instead EMH publish a PFS on no continuous production/ plant data on an unproven technology...? I disagree with you on this point.
It does not matter as LPD do not need EMH to progress. LPD have a strategy and are following it. They will be in production before EMH in my opinion.
I agree that there are risks, but LPD have dealt with them better than most. Given such a positive PFS on a phase 1 (3000tpa) plant, the economics of a full scale plant will be markedly better still.
LPD to save EMH from themselves, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.17M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.1¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.1¢ | $9.476K | 5.380M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | 169328494 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2¢ | 28674554 | 25 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.51pm 07/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LPD (ASX) Chart |