LRS General Discussion, page-3392

@dawgfather What's your thoughts on the rest of the drilling results. It was not communicated, really at all, that there were a significant amount of results (how many ect) that were being delayed.

I feel very mixed with this announcement after reading it properly after work. They sneakily say, that there are significant delays and talk about different technologies to get them quicker however it has been forever already!

One would think, that if the alternative methods of FTIR and ML were as great as they stated, then why the f$#k did we not do this in the first place!?

"1. Significantly lower analytical cost per sample.
2. Substantial increase in sample throughput.
3. Improved ability to quantify kaolinite and particularly halloysite abundances"

Just for my clarification, did they say they will wait until late November to decide whether to do this?

Are we really getting all of cloud nine results before the end of the year?