re: lumacom - disgrace And Durst aren't going to pay for the sign for 4 years either. Obviously Durst can't afford $490k. I'm surprised Durst actually offered to buy the sign - they could have had it for nothing in around 6months.
Their current overheads are next to nothing - they are so low that one may be lead to believe that nobody actually works at LUM HQ any more.
Everyone copping it with LUM ATM including the Tolhurst guys and some of the top 10 who put in around $750k a few months ago - ouch.
re: lumacom - disgrace And Durst aren't going to pay for the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)