lvexpress expands aldp rumours & mentions esi , page-52

THANKS Hunjan.

The tables that are in that link show that Monash Institute has gone to a lot of trouble in the Lab so we have a comparative table of data from all the brown coal liberation technologies.

And for those like me who hear a claim and check it out vigilantly for its integrity (like me), the tables will show you that some products claim to be hydrophilic but they only a have a 'level'of hyrophilic qualities - and Coldry is the highest and most superior in this regard.

This chart also explains why some competing technologies are pushing poo up hill with a fork when they do not use EVAPORATIVE techniques and they insist on being Gully Dwarves (who build contraptions with little purpose, albeit highly skilled work, and go on to further improve the uselessness of those tech's).
COldry is absolutely, categorically in front.

And this report i believe is in response to public/gov't outcries to get a comparative table out there so that we can KEEP THE ALDP PROCESS IN CHECK.

So if COLDRY doesn't get a grant, based on these results, i can say that all the poo in the world will hit a certain fan in Melbourne come September if the government muffles a superior produc6t that the greens would even support.

PARADIGM SHIFT:

ECT endeavours to take dirty technologies that are destined to remain in use for heating and power generation, and they reduce the harmful effects that those tehnologies have on the planet - the first example of which is a type of coal they have improved the efficiency and heat of - while at the same time reducing the coals carbon output by a measurably beneficial percentage. Without such a company, we would be stuck in the cycle of poor fuels being played with by non-innovative technologies that seem not to be able to do anything beyond improving capital expenditure and increasing profit via their own business practice.
At ESI, we aim to improve and hopefully we will be able to reduce the carbon output on many more technologies in the future and make this world a slightly cleaner rock to live on.

Without ESI, there would be no innovation and no improvements in the pre-burn process, it would all come down to companies using the same filthy processes which generate the same filthy bi-products, which would then need to be filtered/sequestered/stored at further cost under the simplistic mentality of 'just put it in someone elses backyard rather than try to eliminate its harmfulness to the earth.

At least ESI is innovating and has a new avenue for technology to advance upon, after having first done the hard work of reducing carbon outputs by around 20% and in some cases close to double that, without the need to sequester or filter anything.
Oh, and for every ton of fuel the company ECT makes, it also recovers the same amount in almost pure distilled quality water for the populations of the world who could use the technology out of a suit case (per se) for their poverty stricken communities...in this way ECT's process has a potential to assists in the public health stategies of places like India and Indonesia.

Congratulations ESI - the top of the tree and that's a FACT unless you wish to scrutinse Lab findings with your own Lab findings, in which case, fire-away.

Cheers