Kingz you are showing your ignorance (to put it mildly) yet again with your comments on RSI. For those that don’t know RSI is a reversion indicator with 70 or above generally indicating a sell and 30 or below indicating a buy, and 14 days is the timescale typically used. For example when the stock hit $0.60 recently the RSI was 69 and when it went as low as 0.38 last week the RSI was 33. The RSI currently is 50, so perfectly neutral and nowhere near overbought as you so stupidly suggested.
I’m not sure which was worse, your inane RSI comments, or Dwhale’s completely nonsensical arguments comparing LVT to LLC which showed a total lack of understanding of recurring revenues. Frankly,I think it’s back to stockmarket kindergarten for both of you!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LVT
- LVT Expenses
LVT Expenses, page-130
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)