LMFAO.
Agree about the input of Stotes & Ryan, their comments often send me back to the books. But they tend to have some solid data/history behind their comments; your comments reflect HC research as your limits.
And as for "attacking the man", please go back and how many times you accused Neil of being on the payroll, ignored his answers to you and kept repeating your unfounded theory, or how many times you purported the worst case scenario as the only potential.
Your "styling", in LWP at least, is not in the above company. More like softer spoken Epicfail, Redtulip or @Harm.
Harm coincidentally appeared after Epic's leaving us; and has so far on the first page of posts 92% "Not Held" - "Sell". No offense, this where I see your input.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TIH
- LWP Discussion Returned
LWP Discussion Returned, page-113
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review
CC9
Chariot Corporation (ASX:CC9) refines Black Mountain strategy, launching Pilot Mine to seize U.S. lithium opportunity