Your math is a little out. After 7 generations, it is 0.78%. 5 generations after 1788 and assuming unbroken paternal and maternal linkages are unbroken, it is less than 1%.
You need a reference point to compare the dna of present day people with at least 2 generations or more before 1788. Unfortunately, I don't think that a representative sample from 2 generations or longer before 1788 exists or hasn't been found yet.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lydia
Lydia, page-33
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 73 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online