Lynas - Never fails to disappoint, page-590

First it is 14 analysis that I use 10 for WSJ. I have explained a couple of times before It is simple you should try to understand. you do not have to believe but if you do not understand you are hurting your investments.

First Analysis do not make money with bad reviews. Companies that recieve bad reviews just do not spend money with companies that do not help them

The Yahoo analyst that i used did not change any thing after Q3 CC including their volume predictions. Al clearly said she was cutting back at these prices. We can wait for Q4 and AR to decide who is correct. Make a note of this post and come back and tell me how I do after the reports. I will post how I did right or wrong. I like being correct. I do not learn from my mistakes if I do not point them out publicly. I never learn sweeping mistakes under the table.

I read the vast majority of links in posts even yours so lets take a look at what the 10 analysis said that the WSJ posted. it is a great source.

Now lets look at what your and WSJ anylisis say
all data is from 3 months.
Buy rattings went from 11 down to 9
Sell ratings went from 1 up to 3.
EPS estimates went down currently there average estimate is as follows Yes I know there are no earnings with Q1 and Q3 reports but this is what they are saying. The numbers are clearly USD From your article correct me if you think I was off by more than 1 cent lets not argue fractions it is only estimates.


Q4 2023 8 cents
Q1 2024 3 cents.
Q2 2024 - 5 cents This is clearly wrong they made AUD 39M in H1 which would be EPS of AUD 4 cents for H1 I guess even WSJ makes mistakes.
Q3 2024 1 0r 2 cents
Q4 2024 0 cents
Q1 2025 - 2 cents

If i average Q1 - Q4 to 1 cent which is higher than mathematical average Then they are much lower than the AUD 10 cents I have been saying as justification for SP drop. This from something you published.

Why did you publish something so negative for Lynas? Only thing I can figure is you did not read it at all. Or were Clueless to what it was saying.
Do you have a third suggestion?

Please note I picked up mistakes by WSJ not because I am smart but because I understand how Lynas is doing. JMO they fed data from 10 analysis into a computer and never did a sanity check. Happens all the time.

You said " Wish someone could explain why 10 analysts are wrong and they are right and keep clogging the board with their same drivel ad nausea when they don’t read NYT and presumably WSJ and they report to be a professional investor. Why are all these other professional analysts wrong may I ask and which one are you?" Well if they are correct than Lynas SP goes lower than I am predicting. you decide.