m & g another 2.25m sold, page-4

"Hoots
They probably still control them in the funds.
Get a big tax write off because of the loss then have them in their name "

I find that highly unlikey Brett - thats why they allready double report with Vanguard as beneficial holder even though they report the Vang/Chase holding under the M & G umbrella - Susbtantail penalties are in palce for that sort of thing would matter if they had 50 related holdings they all have to be reported as the collective total.

Same thing with directors they have to include holdings in their spouses name , company holdings , family trusts and super funds.

hOOt