You desire to put forward incorrect and seemingly pedantic arguments would seem illogical if I didn't know why you do it.
You wouldn't just be trying to distract us from the fact that this morning you tried to have us believe "Its a small number that they didnt even have to report on. Looks to me like an attempt to drum up support more than anything else" when the facts as to why they released the updated doc were obviously highlighted in Bold. Instead of responding to that you have decided to argue about the number of days between notices. hmmmm
Since you want to argue the point lets look at the facts shall we and demonstrate strike 3 for this morning.
The previous notice was released at 8:27am on Feb 2nd 2012. The current notice was released at 8:24am on Feb 27th 2012.
Now if they had sent this correction on the 3rd that would have been one day after the incorrect notice. The 5th would have been 3 days after, the 15th would have been 13 days, the 25th ... 23 days, and therefore the 27th is 25 days after the incorrect notice was filed.
Now you can add whatever spin you like to the subject but it isn't 27 days as you originally stated and it isn't 26 that you now claim either. If you want to be pedantic its actually 24 days, 23 hours and 57 minutes !
Don't go giving me leap year arguments, time zones, mayan calandars or anything that you may be dreaming up for your third version of the answer. Not interested.
CDU Price at posting:
$3.36 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held