Oh, you ARE trying to time the market?Right.And you are...

Oh, you ARE trying to time the market?
Right.

And you are absolutely correct: if you are fortunate enough to possess some proprietary insight that tells you that the DOW is going to fall 30% in the next 12 months then you should indeed be shorting all manner of stuff 'till the cows come home.

Unfortunately, I'm part of the overwhelming majority (99.9%, I suspect) that doesn't have any idea really at what level the stock market index will be tomorrow, next week, next month or next year.

Your successful market timing skillset is something that needs to be nurtured and appreciated, as I had always naively believed that getting it right was somewhat of a rarity.

I guess I had been reading too much overly prescriptive investment theory dogma (see below), and should come to recognise that there are several ways to skin a cat(ma). [See what I did there?]


On Buffett, Market Timing, and Dividends\
By Brian Stoffel | More Articles | Save For Later
June 7, 2012 |

"If we could really predict the market’s moves, timing would be great—the problem is that the evidence is that market timers do not do well. An annual study by DALBAR, a research firm, showed that the average investor in equity funds has averaged only 4.3% per year in returns over the most recent 20-year period in which the S&P500 averaged 11.8% per year—and DALBAR finds that most of this under-performance of the basic market index is due to attempts to time the market. There are a host of other studies that show that market timing leads to returns that substantially lag the market—even before you account for the massive drag of tax on short-term capital gains.

"Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy only when others are fearful."
-- Warren Buffett, 2004 letter to shareholders.

The Oracle of Omaha has a great many quotes that have worked their way into our investing lexicon, but none more so than the one above.

Sadly, it's also the most misunderstood quote of Buffett's time. Below, I'll offer up some context behind Buffett's quote and give some hard evidence to add perspective.

Poor investor results
When Buffett wrote his 2004 letter to shareholders, he wanted to point out that though the market had produced incredible returns over the previous 35 years, the individual investor had largely missed out on such gains. He identified three culprits: fees associated with investment management or frequent trading, making decisions based on fads instead of fundamentals, and a "start-and-stop" approach to investing that leads to poor entry points.

Buffett wraps up the paragraph by saying: "Investors should remember that excitement and expenses are their enemies. And if they insist on trying to time their participation in equities, they should try to be fearful when others are greedy and greedy only when others are fearful."

Though there's certainly truth to Buffett's assertion -- that prices are low and attractive when others are bearish and vice versa -- he never meant for it to become the mantra of the individual investor.

His statement is more akin to a health guru stating, "You shouldn't drink soda at all, but if you insist, stick to diet soda." There's no doubt those who abstain from the beverages are -- all things being equal --- better off, but legions of diet drinkers are given solace from the statement.

Want proof?
Luckily for us, there's a way to back-test how effective Buffett's strategy would have been in the past. Starting in 1987, the American Association of Individual Investors has taken a sentiment survey on how investors think the market will fare over the next six months.

The survey is taken every week, but in order to smooth out aberrations, let's focus on the eight-week rolling average. The long-term average is for 39% of investors to be bullish on the market. We'll say that investors are being fearful when that average is one standard deviation below the norm, and say that they're greedy when it's one standard deviation above the norm.

ILet's assume that, starting in 1988 and ending in 2012, the market timer were to only buy stocks when investors became "fearful," and sell them when they became "greedy,"

In the end, taking this approach would have yielded 415%, versus the market's return of 409%. Indeed, following the "quasi-Buffett" method of buying into the market at certain times slightly outperformed the market.

Are we missing something?
Remember, Buffett said the average investor underperformed because of both expenses and a start-and-stop approach.

Even if we give the market timer the benefit of the doubt on expenses and taxes -- they have zero commissions and all of their holdings are in a tax-advantaged Roth account (even though they didn't exist back in 1987) -- we are forgetting about one key thing: dividends. Every time the market timer sells and sits on his money, he is missing out on the dividends offered up by companies.

When we factor dividends into the equation, we see that the long-term buy-to-hold investor outperforms the market timer by more than 100%

But we're still missing the point
Without a doubt, for the average investor who has better things to do than spend all day crunching numbers on the computer, buying and holding an index fund is an excellent choice. But if we were to take Buffett's advice one step further, we could really juice our returns.

Buffett has said several times that the key to investing success is buying companies with great economics in their favor at reasonable prices, and holding them for the ultra-long run. How would an approach like that work? Take a look at how the book value of Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B ) has appreciated over the same time frame we've been investigating.

The takeaways here are unequivocal: First, though valuation matters, trying to time the market is simply a waste of time and energy. Second, dividends matter -the evidence is crystal clear.