“Should he not be commenting on this stinker that he has promoted and previously been a top 20 holder and been contracted to rather than the petulant moralising directed at other posters?”
You are right...absolutely I am commenting, but not petulantly…perhaps we see politeness...differently? If I am referred to directly or indirectly, don’t I also have the right of reply?
“Seems reluctant or incapable of answering the tough questions and often deflects to personal commentary.”
B., I offer you an invitation to challenge me to a debate on the forum instead of indirectly referring to me in these hidden posts. Simply take me off Ignore. I only ignore or deflect posts where posters ignore facts for their own agendas. I have street university training only with industry quals but happy to debate you on CGB. I extend a challenge to debate you fairly under HC's TOU guidelines with your questions.
Perhaps other members who support/like your posts will encourage you to step out. That is what this forum is about. You have these pressing questions, ask me directly.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CGB
- Major opportunity Moving the Company forward
Major opportunity Moving the Company forward, page-108
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 103 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CGB (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online