“Should he not be commenting on this stinker that he has...

“Should he not be commenting on this stinker that he has promoted and previously been a top 20 holder and been contracted to rather than the petulant moralising directed at other posters?”

You are right...absolutely I am commenting, but not petulantly…perhaps we see politeness...differently? If I am referred to directly or indirectly, don’t I also have the right of reply?

“Seems reluctant or incapable of answering the tough questions and often deflects to personal commentary.”

B., I offer you an invitation to challenge me to a debate on the forum instead of indirectly referring to me in these hidden posts. Simply take me off Ignore. I only ignore or deflect posts where posters ignore facts for their own agendas. I have street university training only with industry quals but happy to debate you on CGB. I extend a challenge to debate you fairly under HC's TOU guidelines with your questions.

Perhaps other members who support/like your posts will encourage you to step out. That is what this forum is about. You have these pressing questions, ask me directly.