Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Makes me sick, page-5

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
JACK

22,141 Posts.

14

02/01/23

14:20

Post #: 65499043
Share

Originally posted by johngalt815 ↑

If a man or woman finds a 17 year old attractive they are considered a paedophile, according to this definition every human would be considered a paedophile at some stage. This is incorrect because there is a world of difference between attracting to a teenager which has gone through puberty vs a child which has not reached puberty. Many countries in the world have a legal age for sex at 16, some countries even 14.

A minor is a legal definition of anyone under the age 18, therefore calling them a minor is the correct terminology, it would be incorrect to label someone finding a 17 year old attractive as a paedophile the same as for someone attracted to pre pubescent humans, which our current media does.

Expand

John,

If you wish to agree with destigmatising paedophiles then so be it.

Whatever blows ya hair back I suppose.

Me I prefer pedos to be known as pedos and punished as such.

Last edited by JACK: 02/01/23
29 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASE

Astute delivers high-grade lithium hits at Red Mountain

Rokeby, BHM, more: The 10 hot stocks HotCopper users watchlisted in Week 30

FTL

Firetail scoops up untested land around Excelsior – including juicy mineralisation target

Most investors will get this earnings season wrong. Will you?

SGQ

St George banks $5M from placement to ramp up Araxá Rare Earths Project

ASX Market Close: Fading miners drag bourse as iron ore price slumps | July 25

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 019 – Dreaming of the 9,000s

RNU

Renascor produces graphite concentrate at Siviour, right on time to meet ex-China demand

What is going on here? Watch out for DroneShield, Pure Hydrogen, and Nel ASA

Friday's HotCopper trends: Renascor concentrate, Larvotto raise | July 25

First 5 Last

SPONSORED BY