Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Makes me sick, page-5

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
JACK

22,100 Posts.

14

02/01/23

14:20

Post #: 65499043
Share

Originally posted by johngalt815 ↑

If a man or woman finds a 17 year old attractive they are considered a paedophile, according to this definition every human would be considered a paedophile at some stage. This is incorrect because there is a world of difference between attracting to a teenager which has gone through puberty vs a child which has not reached puberty. Many countries in the world have a legal age for sex at 16, some countries even 14.

A minor is a legal definition of anyone under the age 18, therefore calling them a minor is the correct terminology, it would be incorrect to label someone finding a 17 year old attractive as a paedophile the same as for someone attracted to pre pubescent humans, which our current media does.

Expand

John,

If you wish to agree with destigmatising paedophiles then so be it.

Whatever blows ya hair back I suppose.

Me I prefer pedos to be known as pedos and punished as such.

Last edited by JACK: 02/01/23
29 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

I88

Infini Resources onto Phase 2 at Portland Creek after spotting 'widespread uranium'

DMP

Is Domino's a steal after -25% plunge?

KGD

Kula picks up unexplored niobium play in Malawi, with surface samples logged

THL

Tourism Holdings says Liberation Day tariffs smashed US RV demand

NMG

New Murchison Gold blasts off at Crown Prince as 'better than expected' results return

Week 27 Wrap: 40% China tariffs?; ASX +10% FY25; US Amazon price spike

HotCopper Highlights, Week 27: G8 scalped, Domino’s drops the box, Gemlife brief hype & more

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

OSL

OncoSil wraps up recruitment for key pancreatic cancer trial

First 5 Last

SPONSORED BY