so now when someone claims that it is illegal to mandate vaccination, or that the business has no right to determine the terms and conditions of employment, there are clear grounds to call out the lie.
The appeal against Justice Robert Beech-Jones's ruling was based on several grounds, including that he did not adequately consider their right to earn a living.In October, more than 40,000 people watched a live stream of the ruling online.
The workers argued their employment future was affected by compulsory vaccines and some of them lived in declared areas of concern, with travel restrictions imposed on them.
In dismissing the appeal today, Justice Andrew Bell said a Court of Appeal panel had concluded that the public health orders "proceeded on the basis that persons, including authorised workers, could choose not to be vaccinated".
In upholding the orders in October, Justice Beech-Jones found they were legal and reasonable and authorised under the Public Health Act, which was designed to ensure public safety.The judge said the orders curtailed freedom of movement, but noted that people's bodily integrity was not violated because "the impugned orders do not authorise the involuntary vaccination of anyone".
Justice Beech-Jones stressed that the plaintiffs "made an informed choice to refuse to be vaccinated".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-12-08/nsw-mandatory-covid-19-vaccines-appeal-dismissed/100683028
