Oh ffs. Your chart does not reference satellite data at all, which directly contradicts your claim that satellite data debunks UHI.
Instead, the data you provide is already known as homogenized, which raises questions about its reliability in assessing urban heat island effects.
Furthermore, you claim that citing Arctic warming as evidence against UHI is actually a non-sequitur.
The mechanisms driving Arctic temperature trends—such as changes in albedo, ocean circulation, and polar amplification—have nothiing to do with localized urban heat effects in temperate and tropical regions.
The two issues are not mutually exclusive, and failing to understand the difference between them reflects a lack of understanding on the dribble you read.
If the argument hinges on satellite data being unaffected by UHI, then that data should be explicitly provided. Without it, your claims are unsubstantiated.
this is so obvious it is pathetic. you have no idea what itis you are even posting.
