Manmade Global Warming - New Extremes, page-10199

  1. 566 Posts.
    I assume we will no longer hear cries of "data manipulation" now you're using these datasets to support your cherry pic.

    Let's look at a couple of the sources you used:

    Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) - BTW The history of this project is a story I love to tell

    Link to their data
    https://berkeleyearth.org/data/
    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6845/6845199-ac49647af0e13efa81b7b1ea2c4f31ab.jpg


    CRUTS (Climatic Research Unit Time-Series)
    Lot's of link to their data, all sources publicly available:
    https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6845/6845206-2c24c6ce6f08c3b7625d8a82d3f529c3.jpg

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6845/6845203-2b1fc9406e239418cf7b88e5a3f51e9c.jpg

    You even include the modelled climate responses
    CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6)

    https://cmip6.science.unimelb.edu.au/
    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6845/6845211-0a046831256d317a5c3f357699a32e26.jpg

    These all show the recent warming is around 1.5C from pre-industrial, they all have extensive documentation and data available for download and analysis. I would encourage all that are skeptical to spend time looking at how vast and complex the climate data is.

    Then think of the mind boggling co-ordination between thousands of people and many nations that would be required to manipulate this data to achieve the consistent results we see.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.