Manmade Global Warming - New Extremes, page-10253

Enough of your nonsense "last week saying that Manabe does not claim the troposphere is radiative"

Manabe and all climate scientists have a comprehensive understanding of both the radiative and convective properties of the atmosphere.
If you were capable and or interested in looking at the models in detail you would know this.

It is the radiative property of the atmosphere that is being changed by our activity which has increased the CO2 content of the atmosphere by around 50%. The effect on the temperature is summarized by the equivalent climate sensitivity which is the amount of temperature increase caused by a doubling of CO2 concentration. This is known to be greater than 2.5 and probably at least 3.

Claiming the "troposphere is NOT radiative" is denial of the measured physical properties of the GH gases which exist in the troposphere which are defined as gases that absorb and emit IR radiation.

I can quote any published text such as this, to support my claim:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/troposphere


You are claiming new physics where this doesn't exist, the burden is on you to prove your claim but you consistently deflect, twist and spin.

You haven't done what I reasonably requested, which is to publish a physically and mathematically realistic alternate explanation.
Pretending the known lapse rate calcs will help you is not going fool anyone with a clue.