bellcurve
,Your reply is less a rebuttal and more of a insight into your ongoing struggle with comprehension. I never questioned meteorology as a science—what I questioned was your inabilty to grasp it. That distinction flew right over your head, as expected.
Your dependence on secondhand assertions and your inability to understand subtle differences is precisely why you mistake regurgitation for understanding.
You don’t engage with science—you echo it, often poorly. We all notice it.
Your posts aren’t contributions; they’re attempts to mask intellectual insecurity with noise. But sure—keep going. The unintentional comedy has its place too.
