You cannot fault the math or the dimensional analysis. Atmospheric actions are a result of electromagnetic interactions. The math proves that.
Working from the ground up. Climate science is a winkfest. I am on 3 weeks leave overseas leaving in about 3 hours. My work is out their and the response is shock. Although I dont believe I have discovered anything new. The establishment just conceal this. The ramifications are pretty big in my opinion. I am working on a follow up. Clearly in draft. Bit to go. But the previous two findings cerainly give it a lot of weight. And to boot further complimented by the work I did on electron charge on Earth and Venus. Not sure If i actually left a copy of the pdf here. Certainly talked about it a lot though
Copy and pasteConventionalthermodynamics defines temperature as a statistical average of kinetic energywithin a system. This interpretation fails to identify the physicalmechanism responsible for that kinetic motion. In this work, I explore acharge-based framework wherein temperature is not intrinsic, but is the result fromelectrostatic and electromagnetic field interactions. Kineticenergy arises from continuous perturbations in electric fields, particularly indense atmosphere where collisional and charge repulsion events dominate. My interpretation offers a physical origin for both temperature and heattransfer as manifestations of electric force. The work builds on the previous work done on the Stefan Boltzmann constant and the gas constants ( kB and or R) from Planck-scale geometry and fieldconstants.
