>Any scientist who has questioned the narrative has been ridiculed and discredited by the scientific community so any name I can put forward will not be accepted by you. So you don't know any? Give me one Zip. Just one. I won't ridicule them.
>Just like Galileo, they will be given their accolades once their views become impossible to deny. Again, Galileo had evidence. That's what climate scientists have. They have evidence.
>Scientific consensus is a poor substitute for scientific facts but this is something that you seem to struggle with. Scientific consensus is how facts are established - replication leads to validity and reliability. I don't struggle with it, that's how it is done.
>I have more faith in the Blogger’s you speak of than the Flogger’s who believe that consensus is fact. This is sad.... like literally, that you would take the word of loser bloggers over experts in their fields.
