@zipperlip it's certainly telling that you haven't logged what you're trying to argue.
self promoting as an independent 'thinker' along with other deniers of anthropogenic climate change is pretty much meaningless without a credible case attached.
credible cases aren't built on lies and misinformation or simply declaring that you will have a lash at this or that fact.
personal beliefs that don't accord with objective verifiable facts are personal delusions, which isn't independent 'thinking' so much as denier noise and cliche.
