Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

29.3.2024From Polar Bear ScienceSusan CrockfordThis is what the...

First 8501 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
birdman29

27,544 Posts.

472

30/03/24

09:25

Post #: 73122369
Share

Originally posted by nippy: ↑

I see your IQ has not improved any.

You cannot tell us which one of the 40 or so models is the correct one for starters. So that's 'irrefutable' done and dusted as rubbish already.

After that you failed to notice that your much trumpeted correlation of carbon dioxide rising with temperature failed to correlate in the 1970's cooling and also the pause in temperature rise more recently. Oops - we noticed while you had your head in the sand.

And of course, Dr Peterson correctly points out that your correlation also falls apart under any other start point than the cherry picked on the IPCC chose.....

The good doctor also points out how the urban heating effect from around 1960 to now caused a bigger temperature rate change then the one you claim is due to carbon dioxide alone so once more your claims are total rubbish even at the quantum level.

Run along now - apparently exercise helps one IQ.

Expand

29.3.2024

From Polar Bear Science

Susan Crockford
This is what the sea ice maximum extent of 15.01 mkm2 looked like on 14 March this year:
It’s almost like Arctic sea ice extent in winter has almost no relationship with global temperatures!
3 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 222 more messages in this thread...

First 8501 Last

SPONSORED BY