Bellcurve,
Very confused from NASA.
A lot of guesswork going back 800,000 years of course but sounds authoritative ad makes a dramatic graph .
They talk about greenhouse gases but then switch to only one co2.
Don`t mention water vapour ( cloud cover ) which is of much greater effect.
But of this minimal one deg C warming since 1950 (despite vastly increased co2 ) how much of that one degree can be attributed to co2 emissions.
Perhaps .2 deg c or less !
However CO2 works well in the closed laboratory test tube to warm NASA would surely agree .
La Nina and El Nino changes are more important, more immediate and greater in creating temperature changes than co2.
Cloud cover changes (water vapour ) also have a greater effect and N2O greater greenhouse effect then co2
These perhaps contribute .5deg C . or more .
Urban heat island effect on measuring sites the rest .
Poor co2 relatively impotent after allowing for nature`s balancing compensations.
A convenient red herring to blame and shift trillions in compensations from the destructive, sinful capitalist economies to the long suffering,ruined third world corruptcracies.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Manmade Global Warming - New Extremes
Manmade Global Warming - New Extremes, page-90
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8,621 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RDN
RAIDEN RESOURCES LIMITED
Dusko Ljubojevic, MD
Dusko Ljubojevic
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online