@kingy you will have noticed that deniers of anthropogenic global warming and the climate change it brings here on HC rarely post sources or attribute their idiocies.
some are so bereft of accruing knowledge that they don't know what sourcing means.
others clearly believe wrongly that because they read something somewhere they are the source of the knowledge.
a unifying factor among deniers is they're up themselves, fueling an arrogance that they're big people who don't have to explain themselves to those lesser than themselves.
but their arrogance still can't paper over their ignorance, which allows posters such as
@jopo believing they can hack and tear unsuccessfully at climate science yet try to style themselves as holders of arcane climate science, ie such as the fake discussion about clouds.
amongst deniers you have to include those with a hard core extremist political bent, who are in it for the fight. I guess this rabble might be tagged neofascists.
rarely do you find among the denier pseuds anyone with a degree in science in any discipline. The quest for knowledge is sadly absent for this rabble, who quaintly delude themselves that all opinions are equal.
what sort of person commits to irrationality and the rejection of knowledge like deniers?
and we're meant to put up with them, be nice to the poor little darlings, when virtually everything they post is an insult.
