Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I reckon the G-man would be a bit more understanding of...

First 3237 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
zipperlip

28,471 Posts.

250

15/08/22

19:32

Post #: 63127027
Share

Originally posted by Wooks08: ↑

@Hawketrader @zipperlip Galileo supported his findings with evidence.

Evidence that the conservative religious orientated society back in 1500s couldn't handle.... Oh hang on, sounds a bit like conservatives in now days too. Actually sounds a lot like the IPA too!

Galileo was a legend of science, he would be laughing his arse off at you lot trying to use him as a supporting argument.
Every counter argument on this thread has never had any substance or shred of evidence to back it up.
Yet when presented with evidence of Global Warming increase and Climate Change, it's ignored, deflected or twisted to suit a false narrative.

Tony Heller and Peter Ridd are flogs of contrarian views - they don't have credible evidence.
Heller is a CPAC ranter
Ridd works for IPA for free
Why do the contrarian mob follow such losers?
Galileo would think those two blokes are pathetic

Expand

I reckon the G-man would be a bit more understanding of courageous scientific mind’s who are willing to stand against the mob consensus.

PS I’m not surprised that you would ridicule any dissenting scientific opinions due to your blind faith.
2 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 5,476 more messages in this thread...

First 3237 Last