The NTA accum was a 9.6% gain for the year vs 11.9% for the asx300 accumulation index, so not a horrible result. Because they're bank heavy it's most likely a result of that sector under-performing + the CHO merger adding additional costs. Add in the increasing discount to NTA (which is pretty wide-spread across all LICs) and that's what you're left with..
I was more worried by this quote by one of the directors in a recent announcement:
'We are currently considering alternative ways of assessing the performance of LICs and promoting this to investors and advisers so that the benefits of an investment in a LIC are better appreciated by all.'
Almost sounds like they want to turn into a retail fund.. what exactly is hard about comparing an increase in Net Tangable Assets + dividends against an accumulation index..
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- march 2009 lows
The NTA accum was a 9.6% gain for the year vs 11.9% for the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ARG (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$8.69 |
Change
0.080(0.93%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.615B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$8.63 | $8.69 | $8.63 | $3.207M | 370.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 996 | $8.68 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$8.70 | 24988 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 996 | 8.680 |
2 | 26945 | 8.660 |
3 | 2656 | 8.650 |
3 | 39785 | 8.640 |
2 | 10193 | 8.630 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.700 | 24988 | 9 |
8.710 | 1362 | 1 |
8.720 | 2000 | 1 |
8.740 | 10674 | 3 |
8.750 | 38670 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ARG (ASX) Chart |