Share
4,841 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 277
clock Created with Sketch. 17/03/20
21:49
Share
Originally posted by brownbox:
↑
I suppose i say "weird" for the following reason - obviously Hydrogen has merit in some areas (uses existing gas lines/by-product of water etc) however it baffles me why the Fed Govt would specifically indicate support for this energy source in the area of cars (yes there is the range potential that for now it is better in, but not for long) Its taken so long to get EV's to this point and charging infrastructure is going in to supporting EV's and ALL the car companies are (or have) tooled up for EV's. There is no 'real' Hydrogen powered car move by car companies (at a mass market level) on the horizon. So IMO its strange that the Fed Govt would go against the obvious flow of where the industry is going or some cases gone.
Expand
Renault, BMW, Honda, Hyundai, Toyota all have hydrogen models. Hydrogen is better suited to heavy transport though, trucks, trains, trams, ships, mining equipment and aircraft.https://www.caradvice.com.au/category/hydrogen/
