Marcus vs Adrian

Sounds like a rematch for Sylvester Stallone in Rocky.

So has it occurred to anyone that if Marcus is able to pull of the financing arrangements it will paint a very interesting picture of the abilities of our Board, CEO and crony advisers.

Marcus will have been able to achieve in a matter of weeks what $6,183,000 worth of (that we know about) CEO and Board could not achieve in 15 MONTHS. Marcus will not have any of the alleged goodwill the Teleport Executive of the Year is supposed to have nor access to all that money Newsat allegedly had to fight off to get the best deal for shareholders (so if the current situation reflects the 'best deal' can anyone here imagine what the other deals were?).

The difference is Marcus is objective in his professional desire to do his best to assess the situation and endeavor to enable Newsat to continue. It would appear that those charged with protecting our interests can only be one of two things;
1) as a collective group massively inferior to Marcus' intellect, or
2) did not possess the same desire to keep the company afloat.

decide for your self which you believe.

Whilst Marcus' job is not to protect us we will survive if it is in the best interests for the creditors. The added bonus will be there is nothing the company can do to ignore his findings or try and smear his name as they appear to have done to Mr Rudd when he presented his findings. I challenge anyone to tell us how or why Mr Rudd would have been anything other than impartial with his report? I certainly can't see how an independent specialist called in to run the ruler over the company by Directors would have some hidden agenda to damage the company. He would only have cared about his payday and that was 100% independent of his findings.