@Fela Thank you for the constructive comments. I agree that the...

@Fela

Thank you for the constructive comments. I agree that the market for products that kill airborne pathogens is going to rise, people are going to be more aware of their surroundings no matter if at home, work or elsewhere. All businesses will have to attempt to show they are being pro-active with internal air quality IMHO.

The unit I mentioned in the prior post, I would NOT recommend, because further research shows that any ozone or hydroxyl generator that can clean surfaces, not just the air going into the unit, should not be in occupied spaces. If any unit can change the structure of bacteria and virus cells, then humans should not be breathing the air, as the same would happen to the cells lining the lungs at a minimum.

I'm guilty of not looking at this properly when I was invested. I bought in when BP did over 18 months ago, and proceeded to trade PO3 over the following 12 months. Between trading gains and cap gains I made over $50k, so do not have any financial beef with this stock.

I posted quite a few glowing reports about this stock last year, without doing the necessary research. I wanted to believe this was breakthrough technology that could change the world. I exited in January of this year when the company direction was changed from the near market ready 'pool filtration' to air purifiers.

The current value of this company is all about the 'disruptive technology' as portrayed by both the company and posters on this forum. With a lot of research I can't find anything that is 'disruptive' at all. It seems like there is a lot of marketing going on from my perspective.

From the company website ...."Welcome to the next generation of purifying – Streamer Plasma from PuriflOH."

If it was a unique disruptive technology, as portrayed, then how do products like this already exist??
https://www.daikin.com.au/our-product-range/air-purifiers/air-purifier#tech-specs

From Daikin ...."Streamer discharge is what makes a Daikin Air Purifier so effective.
The streamer's plasma discharge of high-speed electrons activates oxygen and nitrogen molecules, rendering them capable of oxidative bacteria decomposition, which is one of the most effective ways to eliminate bacteria, viruses, mould and allergens from the air.
Daikin's streamer discharge technology has a wider discharge range than conventional, glow discharge air filters, creating an oxidative decomposition speed over 1,000 times faster than for conventional air filters."
https://www.daikin.com.au/faq/what-daikin-streamer-technology

This Daikin unit includes a "deodorising catalyst filter" to deodorise formaldehyde and any remaining odors.

Only recently did Purifloh add a "neutralising filter" to the webpage as part of the air purification unit. No stock market release nor announcement about it at all, why not?? Why do the discharges from the unit and air now need to be neutralised, when they never mentioned it necessary before? Are the scientists that are working on this finally catching up with reality of what's harmful?

The TB 'trials' were absolute amateur stuff, by themselves should have been raising some red flags among investors paying attention. If the scientists in charge could get that so wrong, then what else have they missed??

This is from a market release in December 2017, pg 5 under 'air treatment' .....
.."..the focus now is on the final design, product packaging, cost and in situ performance validation"
https://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=01932237

Then just a few days ago was this ...."The Company’s product development activities remain focused on air purification systems"

It was up to final design and packaging nearly 3 years ago...

My real concerns are what I missed when 'not looking'. What exactly is so unique here that leads to a huge market?? Ozone production? No! Hydroxyl production? No!

So what is unique and disruptive about the technology?? Anyone??