So you can't supply any evidence or links to any court documents or anything pertaining to the case that showed that the initial ruling overturned was done so on any reasonable grounds rather than a simple court technicality or loophole in order to do so ?
We are well aware of how many appeals use this tact to get out of a sentencing . I simply wish to determine if this was not the case here but considering you seem unable to comment on it any further or supply any supporting evidence. How can I conclude that you're telling the truth instead of hiding it ? Especially considering your extensive history in hiding that truth and posters then unveiling it .
If you really want to prove yourself here I suspect you won't just make up some more fairy stories but actually supply some hard evidence . Absent that everyone will just continue to be concerned about your activity. Running away from that won't solve it
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
