So according to you ... The company itself lied about the...

So according to you ...
The company itself lied about the uranium discovery in the licenced area
The Minister of mines Eric Jensen lied about the uranium discovery in the licenced area
Experts in the field lied about the uranium discovery in the licenced area
The Greenlandic Press lied about the uranium discovery in the licenced area
In fact all of Greenland who voted in their most comprehensive survey that 90% of the populace felt they did not trust Tanbreez. Understood there had been a uranium discovery in the licenced area
All proven numerous times in these threads.
Then we have little old gbb. No figures no proof . Proven to be offering misinformation in these threads dozens of times (Please do ask me for examples cause I'm happy to go through them with you, As you were unable to explain why you had done so every time I've asked ).Now selectively drilling Samples within the licenced area and trying to tell us that uranium with a 1.5 billion year half life. Magically disappeared again.

Here's an idea. Maybe you know where the uranium is in the licenced area and are choosing not to drill there?
That is very possible isn't it?
Do you by chance have an economic interest in the project?
I am sure you would be quiet concerned of the new uranium ban ceasing the Exploitation licence should the authorities become aware of it?
So why is it that all these people have clear evidence of the company's declaration of uranium found in the licenced area but all you can offer are fairy stories and refused to offer the documentation showing specifically where the drilling has been conducted and where the uranium was discovered ?

We would all be very open to you offering more than evasive statements and repeating what we know is not true because surely if you had nothing to hide you wouldn't hide it