This is a prime example of why the AISC sticker headline is so often misleading.
Cheaper production?
Silver Lake increased their cash/bullion balance during the June Q by 29 million, RMS by 12 million.
RMS and SLR forward guidance for AISC is basically identical when you account for SLR stockpile drawdowns
Producing the same? SLR low range (260,000oz) production guidance is RMS mid range.
RMS Enterprise Value $763,000,000
SLR Enterprise Value $1,033,000,000
SLR's $273,000,000 higher EV sounds fair for a company that has:
3 compared to 2 operating processing plants,
has 130,000 oz of high grade stockpiles,
is currently generating over twice the amount of cash,
has a much stronger balance sheet,
and requires less CAPEX to continue it's operations into the future.
I did prefer the management of RMS but starting to have my doubts. SLR's management have made better decisions lately, hence the reason their SP has outperformed RMS, most operating metrics show SLR deserves their higher EV.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RMS
- market revaluation 75 cents.
market revaluation 75 cents., page-123
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 154 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RMS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$2.14 |
Change
0.040(1.90%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.456B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$2.09 | $2.15 | $2.07 | $5.340M | 2.516M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 96948 | $2.13 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$2.15 | 39393 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 715 | 2.130 |
4 | 29735 | 2.110 |
2 | 7735 | 2.100 |
2 | 10235 | 2.090 |
2 | 7715 | 2.080 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.160 | 3600 | 1 |
2.170 | 7060 | 1 |
2.180 | 46639 | 3 |
2.190 | 10443 | 1 |
2.200 | 71043 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RMS (ASX) Chart |