If a religious body doesn't want to marry people of the same sex thats fine , that is a matter for the people of that religion to decide.
But to call a same sex union marriage under law is easy , a rose by any other name is still a rose.
If two people have a legal union and they want to call that legal union a marriage and they want the law to recognise it as such , what is the big deal.
I know the zealots will have a hard time with this but they had a hard time with mini skirts and women voting , they will get over it , it will have zero affect on their lives and will provide a lot of people with a sense of stability and belonging.
No one loses here , their are only winners in this.
Again religions will have to make up their own mind and try to work out if their mythical creator would accept such a thing. Thier choice but they should impose their beliefs on the rest of our secular society.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- marriage only for a man and a woman
If a religious body doesn't want to marry people of the same sex...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online