marriott hotel completely destroyed, page-122

Imperial, again taking something out of context to further your claims.

firstly, the Watson and Jones duet are part of an 9/11 truth movement


As to your poll results, again miss referred.



The first 9/11 poll carried out by the New York Times and CBS News was conducted in May 2002. The same 9/11 related question was asked again in April 2004 and October 2006. The 2002 and 2006 polls were apparently published for the first time not by CBS or the NYTimes, but by polling researcher AngusReid.com

The 2004 poll was conducted by telephone with 1024 adults nationwide in the US, with a 3% margin of error. The 2006 poll was conducted by telephone on 983 randomly-selected citizens of the United States, with a 4% margin of error.

One of the questions was the following:

"When it comes to what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States, do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?"

Again jones has used the following approach in coming to his conclusion:

These people (in the 9/11 truth movement) use the "reverse scientific method"… they determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion."

If you really review the responses to the October 2006 report that imperial likes to quote

Oct 2006 responses: 16% said "telling the truth", 53% said they are "mostly telling the truth but hiding something", 28% said they are "mostly lying", 3% not sure. so it is not that only 16% beleive and the other 84% dont beleive.

rather of the 84%, 53% are mostly telling the truth but hiding something. This is is not unreasonable as given the micheal moore movie and other 9/11 truth documentaries, it is clear that the Bush adminstration knows something that it isnt telling. I would agree with this, but I would also say the something about Howard and rudd and any other politication, buisness etc. It is a come beleif.

also the poll is in 0ctober 2006, and the official results only can out in August 2008. Oh my god, the media new about the official results before they were published.



so again imperial taking things out of context to justify claims is wrong. tell people the complete story not what you want to beleive