Hi AICp,
From my correspondence with Tony:
"The 95% confidence intervals are calculable from the numbers of patients and the PPA/NPA provided in our last Australian release. The lower bound of the 95% CI for both PPA and NPA for all diseases in the Australian paediatric results were above the 75% target that we had for the US study"
I used ASX Results:
https://www.resapphealth.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/1684564.pdf
And these sites:
https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...ercent-agreement-PPA-NPA-and-overall-rates-of
Happy to be corrected (could be one or two small errors), but double checked figures and I'm 98.5% confident they're correct. I could go into detail about calculations if anyone needs.
Cheers n1
- I didn't calculate for "cough only" as I figured those results are redundant going forward, as the 'best' model uses four features/not one
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RAP
- Math problem with results
Math problem with results, page-216
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 186 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RAP (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & MD
Charles Armstrong
CEO & MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online