And now the summary of both Coldry and Matmor as team products (It is self explanatory as to why these two would go hand in hand from an industrious point of view)
This includes quotes while also including other perspectives which are to do with infrastructure, geography and commercial/industry infrastructure shortfalls and gap-filling:
The combined advantages of the Matmor and Coldry process over traditional blast furnace iron making are:
1) Replacement of expensive metallurgical coal with cheap, abundant lignite
2) The opportunity to replace expensive high grade Iron Ore (60%+Fe) with cheaper, low grade Iron Ore
3) Capital equipment is estimated at 50% less than traditional blast furnaces for equivalent production capacity.
4)Cost of production estimated at 50% less per liquid tonne compared to traditional methods.
5) Process requires significantly less heat / energy
6)Able to recover iron from millscale and other waste materials
7) Use of lignite as opposed to black coal throughout the entire process
8) The creation of distilled quality water which would otherwise be sent to atmosphere and react in an inefficient manner to the foundry and energy production process; which can be captured for storage or cooling
9) Reduction in warming the environment on an annual scale and reduced energy/carbon offset obligations fo rthe companies adopting the technologies
10) Gap filling - industry shortfalls can be taken up by both of the products while reducing comparative costs for otherwise expensive processes within the industry as it stands
11) localised maximisation of previously coined 'waste' minerals/material, without need to import or transport - an entirely draining cost within the industry with little to no short-cuts otherwise available without these two products
12) Localised use of brown coal pits - where standard requirements are reliant on infrastructure, capital and dangerous transportation/agitation
13) Cost cutting in the form of water, raw material and fuel/deisel expenditure by the companies who adopt the product...
I could go on...
Basically, these two product have an omnipresent effect on all facets within existing businesses which rely on smelting, energy production, coal use, metals recoveries and water to one extent or another.
Who owns the coal that will be utilised is irrelevant - thats something the companies who adopt our products/technologies need to address and they wouldn't approach us if they hadn't a solution at hand.
All this company needs to do is show:
cost reduction - energy, materials, transport, water etc...
mineral recovery maximisation benefits - nickel, steel, lignite/brown coal varieties etc...
carbon and heat output reductions (per annum)
relaxed dependancy on infrastructure
And may deliver benefits of governmental incentives depending on the government/society at hand.
Now i would like to highlight one example to show the immediate impact that Coldry and Matmor would have right no if they were available on a commercially prolific scale...
Look at Brisbanes harbour as we read and write today.
It is packed with ships waiting in line- bottlnecked mind you - to export coal and steel to almost every corner of the globe, but importantly (to my point) they are heavily destined for China and they are going too slowly.
As global economies pick up (after this particular tier of booming) things will only get worse.
Immediately - Coldry would be a global solution to countries who are needing to having for coal to make their steel and to produce energy to make foundries and power stations run...
There is a massive shortfall and Coldry could fill it.
Then, even with Coldry there would still be a need for more coal, which would come as the bottlenecks in various ports world wide eased. Also, the economies would then be able to rely on local (or nearby and more local) import of brown coal pellets - coldry - again, until that bottleneck eased.
The result would be that the countries could continue to produce iron and energy while also being capable of recovering other metals (from years of stockpiling 'rubbish tailings' which would be immediately available to them).
Basically, without itemising every single facet of the benfits for having access to Coldry and Matmor, i think these examples pretty well say it all and the mind can wander from there, while boggling at the effect that the two technologies will have on the industry worldwide.
We have something that will be of great value, both immediately and in the next global boom (which may continue well into the 20's).
Right now, these two products could save lost production time and save monetary costs for every economy that touched them.
This is why many tout the share to be worth a minimum of around 14 cents right now and why it may become a $1 - $2 share in the relatively near future.
Have a think and apply the benefits of the two products to a 3rd world country in need of water, energy and materials....
Cheers
Lautrec
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- matmor's potential
And now the summary of both Coldry and Matmor as team products...
Featured News
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.001(20.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.515M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | $1 | 362 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
49 | 28544487 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 11086493 | 16 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 16076 | 0.003 |
46 | 26049008 | 0.002 |
27 | 33536532 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.002 | 16112 | 2 |
0.003 | 8919464 | 15 |
0.004 | 5782988 | 10 |
0.005 | 4226359 | 26 |
0.006 | 5155234 | 9 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 28/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ECT (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
UNT
UNITH LTD
Idan Schmorak, CEO
Idan Schmorak
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online