"Wotsup,The name is not missing from the Old Testament.I have a...

"Wotsup,
The name is not missing from the Old Testament.
I have a copy of the Jerusalem Bible. The Devine name 'Yahweh' is found throughout the Old Testament but nowhere in the New Testament."

You would know full well that most Bibles do NOT have 'Yahweh' in them, so cut out the BS.
--------------
"Wotsup,
There is no evidence that the Devine name was ever in the New Testament.
If you have a problem with Jesus quoting Lord instead of Yahweh, take it up with him.
I am only quoting the inspired text, and I suggest you stop adding and changing it with your corruptions."

John 17:12 - While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name:
17:6 - I have revealed Your name to those You have given Me out of the world.

As Jesus would say, have YOOOOU Tonio not read the scriptures, my Fathers name is Yahweh and not LORD as that is ONLY a title.

Ex 3:15 - And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, Yehowah God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.

Despite the corruption of the name not being carried over into the NT, YOU Tonio from the clear passage above and More in the OT, WHY do you condone, and adopt this corruption??????????

This changing his name to a tile Lord, come about by the NON BELIEVING Jews, and YOOOOOU Tonio are following in their footsteps
Why in God's and Jesus's names for that matter, would you even think of doing such, never mind doing it?

THERE IS NO IF BUTS MAYBE'S, IT IS SO CLEAR AND OBVOUS, THAT IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING, HIS NAME SHOULD HAVE BEEN CARRIED OVER INTO THE NT.

I expect another reason it wasn't carried over was to confuse you goats, as in at times you lot cannot tell the difference between the two Lords being spoken of, Father and Son.
Example -> Ppm is on record of insisting, that there is ONLY One Lord, hmmmmmmmmmm, if that's not confusion, I don't know what is (He'll no doubt deny this now?).

...................
"Wotsup,
I repeat the only corruption is by you.
You are the one who adds words to the Bible, removes words, rearranges them and redefines their meanings.
If that fails, you appeal to the interlinear, once again removing words, rearranging them and redefining their meanings."

That is basically a LIE.
If I add words, they are in brackets to show that they are not in the original, but they belong BECAUSE other passages show this is what is meant.
I do it, as the clear message is not entering the likes of your head and this has gone on for years, the blind leading the blind.

The Inter would be the basics from which the Bibles should be or were supposed to be translated from, hence the Inter shows up the corruption of wrong words being used and the abuse of word order, to create an untrue picture.
Often the True definition is totally tossed aside and they opt for "usage" = translates to, bugger the definition and lets use the words to suit our planted seeds, come fairy story.

I give the Inters range of definitions, which then CLEARLY show the context as to how a words meaning should be read.
Example -> the misuse and ABUSE that you lot use with the word "through", as in all things created through Jesus.
You lot lie and say this means the likes of, a direct hands on of Jesus creating, which is a bare face lie.
Through = on account of, by reason of, because of, for the sake of = Yehowah alone and by himself, created all things for the future one to be, born from Mary Isa 44:24 and More, DEMAND this, it's as clear as a bell, and you lot blatantly toss this clear truth aside.

THEREFORE TONIO;
"It's time you did so serious navel gazing.
There is a "Strong message" in the Bible against those that corrupt God's word."

Not to mention, using his NAME in vain as you're doing, and happy to do so, based on your post.