I'm a little curious about something. I know that thorium's radioactivity level (assuming no synthetic isotopes) is pretty low - its half life is 1.4x1010 years. I'm just not certain how it would compare to typicial background radiation levels. Gut feel says that it would be comparatively low, but I'm not a nuclear physicist.
Of course, the level would increase as you get more of it, and more concentrated samples, but still ... I can't help but feel that this is all a "RADIATION IS EVIL!!!!!11!!1!!!1!!one" knee-jerk thing, to a fair extent.
And, to be fair, as an alpha emitter, it's a substance you don't want to be ingesting, but there are worse offenders in that regard, I think.
I'd really like somebody who knows more about nuclear physics than I to comment - it's been bugging me for a while now.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PEK
- maybe better than mt weld?
PEK
peak rare earths limited
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
31.0¢

maybe better than mt weld?, page-2
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
31.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $133.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
31.0¢ | 31.0¢ | 30.5¢ | $93.86K | 302.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
12 | 747683 | 30.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
31.0¢ | 947734 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
12 | 747683 | 0.305 |
12 | 651497 | 0.300 |
9 | 480486 | 0.295 |
8 | 292851 | 0.290 |
4 | 153800 | 0.285 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.310 | 947734 | 5 |
0.315 | 207683 | 6 |
0.320 | 422015 | 10 |
0.325 | 168068 | 3 |
0.330 | 1182702 | 10 |
Last trade - 12.24pm 17/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PEK (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Iggy Tan, Executive Chairman
Iggy Tan
Executive Chairman
SPONSORED BY The Market Online