Which , of course ,was quite incorrect.
As we should all know by now , return on equity is not a good measure of profit.
His questions were not a way of actually finding anything out.
Do you think that profit is being hidden?
I cant see any signs of that in the balance sheets.
Was McKim being dumb , or just being a tool?
I suppose he could be both.
Now the big 2 have a case to answer as far as land banking and treatment of suppliers goes, but who remembers any of that while the circus clowns are in town.
A question for all.
What should the profit be , and how should it be measured ?
And in arriving at the answer , what allowance should there be in those numbers for a retailer being better than another?
ie better technology , better customer service, better range, better treatment of staff?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- McKim and Contempt.
McKim and Contempt., page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
Shanthar Pathmanathan, MD
Shanthar Pathmanathan
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online