Media Attention, page-123

I value inputs of JS and yourself (there are time I don’t from you to be frank)
My point is, posts and research and comments on hotcopper are helpful if used the right way. For example, if I bought Ltr at 2 cents because I benefited from someone’s post and from my own research, can I really blame the person if I didn’t sell when I got 100 baggers?
And if that’s his passion to do research, why should people get envious? That the guy has 100 likes for most posts means people benefit from his posts. And for those who don’t, the quickest way to show that is put him in ignore.
If you then try to police forums or as you say hold them to account for what he does as his passion to share his research, do you really think you can do that across hundreds of stocks on asx? Besides most of his posts are a result of hours and even weeks of research. People on hotcopper try to share information. And it’s everyone’s responsibility to vet the information.

I’ve done the same on Warriedar. I’ve recognised the opportunity based on experience on antimony as I’ve been on LRV. I don’t discount that I’ve also benefited from the information shared here (not from you as I didn’t see your older posts ). Now I don’t know what you said in that post that JS responded to because you asked the mods to remove it. But it doesn’t matter, the response implies to me what you said. I’m not saying it’s true or false. I just said I don’t see it as you were on ignore prior to removing it.

I’m not saying people should put you on ignore. Where Did I say that?

I’m stating my approach is to put people on ignore from time to time because of my own choice to do so. And not an endorsement for other people to ignore you in case you misunderstood.
I also acknowledged that you’re knowledgeable. But not all knowledge is always desirable. I guess that is a reasonable statement to you. Especially with regard to investments.