Why do you suspect AI?Because the article is grammatically...

Why do you suspect AI?
Because the article is grammatically correct, coherent and (to my quick read) accurate?

These days dodgy spelling, poor grammar and out-of-context quotes are a sign of human, not artificial intelligence at work.

Suggest you get with the program and don't waste your time trying to guess what's AI and what's not.

ChatGPT, Bard et al are not inately 'intelligent' - their designers freely acknowledge they have no 'original' thought. but they retrieve, analyse and importantly present underlying data better than most humans already ... and they are very early in their learning curve.

Compare/contrast most of the posts in these threads ... how much represents truly original thought?

I'd suggest near-zero ... most kudos goes to posters who are skilled at keeping tabs on myriad pieces of data, connecting dots and most importantly, telling a story that others can follow. All very AI-like qualities.

Give it a year, tops and chat-site media such as HC will be superceded as an AI output ...

... you pay a small subscription to cover running costs and receive a daily, hourly or live guidance on your area of interest - delivered to your requested level of detail and all totally on-topic and maybe even containing blind-testable buy/hold/sell recommendations based on your personal financial situation (which of course you've agreed to share with the AI-HC provider).

Betcha.