The point of the post is to highlight when investing there are...

The point of the post is to highlight when investing there are many factors which much be taken into consideration, including ones investment time line. For those who envisage equities as a 7 to 10 year investment, Imugene's results have been positive. Yahoo simply reiterates that fact.

Yet for the majority of IMU investors who have invested for say a 3 year time frame, the IMU investment has been a poor one. I'm not trying to find anything positive, or being desperate in any way, simply stating the facts. I would like to think my posts are balanced as a rule of thumb, focusing on facts such as this, as opposed to an "angle' as it were. The fact is that whether or not current investors have entered at "bad entry prices" as you suggest is unknown as of yet, if they are indeed investing for the long term.

But thank you for your response...

DYOR