Hi T&P, Very interesting post about the bad side effects of...

First 15152 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
MrLearner

801 Posts.

235

20/08/24

13:29

Post #: 75285795
Share

Originally posted by Tenacity & Patience: ↑

Hey Bluegumnuts,
Great article.

I fully understand the need for both safety & efficacy, and the important role entities like the FDA play. However, having seen both of my parents demise to cancer ( one quickly, one slowly), I question the bureaucracy and time required in some cases. People who have cancer and their suggested standard of care, as a treatment is Chemotherapy or radiation. Some (especially the elderly) should their diagnosis be terminal, choose to spend their last days before falling, sick to be enjoyed. Others choose to jump into the standard of care immediately. Hoping to prolong life at any cost, maintaining that slim glimmer of hope, that a cure might come along whilst fighting it. I for one couldn't criticise either choice having witnessed both decisions amongst friends and relatives.

What I can't understand though in this bureaucratic world, is why the decision isn't left up to the sufferer. It's almost like being on the roof of a skyscraper building, with flames engulfing the floors below. The Fire Safety Warden then appears, inspecting a parachute one of your work mates dragged up to the roof, they had spare. The warden Said, sorry that parachute isn't- xztaybafsd approved and I can let you use it. Guess what- I'm using it !

Why then couldn't those who don't want their last days, or believe they don't have the strength to battle the side effects of cancer, to have a choice.
Wavers could be signed, with those wishing to take the punt on products like ours to be administered. At least it wouldn't be after failing two standard of care treatments, with our product coming all too late. A simple couple of vaccine jabs a few months apart, might be something tolerable for them, whilst still giving them plenty of hope.

I symphysis with anyone, and their families living with the suffering and decisions to be made. Hopefully our Bile Duct, Mast Study will be successful in gaining an unmet solution, as a new Standard of Care. It's my understanding from educated Bio posters here, that Oncologists can use it on other cancers, should we meet that need and FDA approval.

We'll know soon enough- New's is a coming !

-GO IMU!

Not Financial Advice - Opinions Only - DYOR!

Expand

Hi T&P,
Very interesting post about the bad side effects of chemo/radiotherapy.
There are many cancer sufferers who have endured surgery, or chemo, or radiotherapy, or all three, or a combo of them in an attempt to get rid of their cancer. After 5 years of all three of these, my cancer has been beaten for now. It bounced back again with a vengeance 2 years ago so my oncologist wont say I am in remission. I am now on standard Capecitabine tablets at home which is good (minimizes trips to the cancer centre).
My reason for posting is a question which has confused me for awhile now. Capecitabine is PREVENTING (hopefully) a recurrence of my cancer, while IMU's proposed vaccine will only work when cancer is detected. It serves no purpose unless you have already contracted cancer. Am I correct ? What I mean, it is not a vaccine like the usual influenza or shingles etc? It would be a huge step to cease chemo and rely on IMU's vaccine to beat it if/when the cancer returns.
Your response would really be appreciated. Many thanks

IMU Price at posting: 5.4¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
8 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Making money: How many microcaps should be in an investor's portfolio?

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

Aussie inflation seemingly hit a 3 year low. So why's the ASX200 red?

The Altcoin Landscape (Part 1): Key alternative cryptocurrencies to watch

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too