Media tiptoes around PC issue, page-78

First 78 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jantimot

30,924 Posts.

174

01/06/18

22:44

Post #: 33445759
Share

Originally posted by dolcevita ↑

FGS.

If you're going into a known violent situation you will bring specialised groups. OBVIOUSLY.

But this was a surprise attack.

Your initial claim was that women were inherently more vulnerable in this situation.

AND that the media was hiding this from us, at least at first.

Well the fact is, that women are NOT inherently more vulnerable to surprise attack.

Even with the best training and skills, even a big burly male or two can be overcome by surprise.

Defeated on this you you shifted your ground. Now you're pretending that this is all about known violent incidents.

You're hard work. Really you are. And you are constantly shifting ground. Valid points were made to contest your arguments and all you can do is shift ground. You never concede. I would never put you into a negotiating position, because you escalate, and never concede and fail to understand what the key issues are.

Seriously.

Get this: women have skills sets that are at times different to male skill sets. BUT in police situations they can usually defend equally.

Any difference in one situation is more than compensated for in another. For instance, indefusing volatile situations that can develop into violence.

Now THINK! This is a surprise incident.

All they can do there is revise police training that will apply to ALL police officers, regardless of gender.

Get it??

Expand

A surprise attack? Were they not on duty? Why were they surprised?

But, that aside, if a 48 y/o half cut bloke using just his fists can single-handedly fight off three machete wielding terrorists into the guns of waiting police, I don’t see why trained female police officers shouldn’t be able to do the same. So long as they remain alert.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...efiant-football-fan-shouted-terrorists-tried/
Upvote

Reply